UNDER CONSTRUCTION I haven't typed in the comments yet |
Here I present a brief overview of some general comments about each question.
1) In which stage(s) of the research process do you think computers can be most useful? Please explain your answer. Cite specific examples of actual computer applications to support your answer. (5 pts)
Most everybody got full credit here. The most common reason not to was a lack of examples to support your answers.
2) Describe some ways that the World Wide Web in particular can be useful in the research process. Use examples to support your answer. (5 pts)
The most common omission here was that an important part of the WWW is the use of e-mail to contact other researchers in your field.
3) What is the purpose of giving a conference presentation? Briefly describe the "hourglass" structure of a talk. What are three key parts of the preparation for a talk and explain why they are key? (5 pts)
Generally people did well with this one too, although occasionally somebody would ignore one of the parts of the question.
4) Internet exercises: (5 pts total)
b) Using PsycInfo, find three references to research examining the Yerkes-Dodson Law. Copy the abstract as well as the full reference.
a) Find, on the World Wide Web, a page that explains the Yerkes-Dodson Law (or Relationship). Copy and paste that explanation into your Word document. Also include the address where you found it.
We had pretty much 5's across the board here.
5) Excel exercise: (10 pts total)
a) attached at the end of the exam is a brief description of a fictional experiment, as well as a data set for that experiment. Your job is to enter the data into an excel file. As you did with the homework, include a title, and use formatting that identifies the headings and computed cells as different from the entered data.
b) sort the data by test type
c) Compute the means (average) and standard deviations (stdev) for the totals and the marginals. By totals I mean the statistics for all the test scores and all anxiety ratings. By marginals I mean the average and standard deviations of test scores and anxiety ratings for the easy test, and again for the medium test, and again for the hard test.
Several files didn't appear to use the mean and standard deviation functions in the cells where the reported these figures.
A few people forgot titles
A few people had the wrong sets of numbers included in their marginal computations
6) Word exercise: (10 pts total)
a) Using the means and deviations from 5c, make a table in Word. Be sure to use correct APA style (hint: you may look at the web links to figure out how the table should look, or use the style manual).
b) Make a reference section, using the three references from question 4. Again use APA style (the same hint from 6a applies here too).
c) Format the entire MS Word portion of the exam (including Part A as well). Include your name in a header. Insert the page number in the footer. Make sure the margin are 1 inch on all sides (including top and bottom). And use Times, 12 point font for the entire document.
By far the two most common errors were:
Incorrect APA style for tables (including extra lines, redundant headings, uninformative labels, misaligned columns, etc).
Other common errors were forgeting the header or footer part of the assignment, messing up the margins, etc.
Incorrect APA style of references (mostly not indenting and including the full first names of authors>
7) Powerpoint presentation: (10 pts total) For this part you'll make a brief presentation of the fictional experiment. As part of your presentation make sure to include the following.
a) An explanation of the Yerkes-Dodson law (see 4a).
b) A brief summary of background information. That is, summarize (based on their abstracts) the key points from the three articles found in question 4b.
c) Present the table from question 6a.
d) Paste in the graphs of the data (these can be found on class web page by clicking on the Exam1 link).
e) Use transitions and animations where appropriate.
The most common error was the exlusion of the names of the authors of the background research. You've got to give credit where credit is due.
Other errors included: not fiting all the text onto the slide, using dark letters on dark backgrounds, using print that was too small, etc.
47155 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Could have used a few more examples |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Test type labels on the table should be more informative than "1, 2, & 3" That is "easy", "medium", and "difficult" would be better. |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 48 |
13776 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is great for contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | You should have used a more informative label for test type in your table |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Need to remember to cite the authors' names in your background review one slide didn't fit entirely on the screen (third study) |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
jap10 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is very useful for keeping in e-mail contact with other researchers |
3 (5pts) | 4 | The main purpose of a talk is to convey new research findings being clear is a major part of reaching that goal |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 8 | Alignment of the columns in the table shoudl be fixed APA style doesn't report authors' full first names |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Need to report the names of the authors of the background studies No use of animation in the presentation |
Total (50pts) | 44 |
68153 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 3 | Forgot to answer the preparation part of the question |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | The table could be improved by removing some of the redundant labels |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
11691 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Test type label in the table should be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to cite the names of the authors who did the studies that you reviewed |
Total (50pts) | 48 |
momar | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 4 | need more examples |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Table wasn't APA style test type label needed to be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 7 | The background section was far too sketchy |
Total (50pts) | 43 |
pette | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 4 | This answer needed to be expanded |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 6 | There was no page number in the footer APA style doesn't include authors full first names in the references The table format wa incorrect |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
91476 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | The table didn't follow APA guidelines |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
11338 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 8 | Mean and standard deviation cells did not use functions |
6 (10pts) | 8 | the table was not APA style APA style for references does not include authors' full first names |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Your background research section was too sketchy |
Total (50pts) | 43 |
32566 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Don't use full first names in references Need to get rid of the vertical lines |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 48 |
steve | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 3 | No examples |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Test type label should be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
apple | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 2 | What about the "hourglass shape" and "preparation" parts of the questino? |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Test type label in the table should be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 8 | The table didn't fit on the slide no graphs |
Total (50pts) | 43 |
72076 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Didn't include a header and a footer the table didn't follow APA guidelines |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to cite the names of your authors |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
10097 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 7 | Table not APA style References not APA style (don't include authors' full first names) test type labels should be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Background review section too brief and needs to include the names of the researchers |
Total (50pts) | 44 |
12356 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | In the table, why was N on separate lines? |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Table was too hard to read |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
tires | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Test type labels should be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to cite the names of the researchers of the background articles |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
hbs35 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Redundant information in the labels in the table don't use authors full first names in the references |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Table formating was tough to read, dark on dark isn't a good strategy |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
music | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 3 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail More examples were needed |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Don't give authors full first names in the references (so says APA) |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
tnjul | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 3 | Good way to contact other researchers via e-mail Also this answer needed more examples |
3 (5pts) | 3 | What about the hourglass shape? |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | ? | No marginal means and standard deviations two-thirds of the data are missing, where did they go? |
6 (10pts) | 5 | Not APA style table where are the standard deviations and means? Don't use full first names in the references why do you have data for individual subjects? |
7 (10pts) | 5 | Incomplete No graphs No table Don't mention the authors names of the background articles |
Total (50pts) | ? |
68555 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 9 | Labels are hard to read due to overlap |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Don't use full first names in the references Table labels are a bit redundant |
7 (10pts) | 9 | No graphs |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
spacey | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | WWW is also a great way to contact other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Your table didn't follow AOA format, especially with all the extra lines APA style doesn't list authors' first names in the reference section |
7 (10pts) | 9 | In the background review, you need to cite the authors of the studies that you review. |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
18168 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 4 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 3 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 2 | ?? |
Total (50pts) | 38 |
waffl | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 9 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
bosch | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 7 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
46845 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | WWW is also very useful for contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 7 | -Test type labels on the table should be more informative than "1, 2, & 3" That is "easy", "medium", and "difficult" would be better. -APA reference style doesn't give author's full first names, only initials -Table doesn't conform to APA style |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
00369 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | The table needs more work to follow APA style Also the width of the columns in the table need to be adjusted |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Need to cite the authors of the background studies Should label the graphs so we know which is which |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
ralph | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 6 | Table didn't follow APA guidelines test type labels need to be more informative I didn't see any headers or footers |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to give the names of the authors in the studies that you cite |
Total (50pts) | 44 |
fresh | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 3 | Need more examples The web is also very useful for contacting, via e-mail, other researchers |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 6 | Several of the cells did not appear to use the functions the totals were wrong |
6 (10pts) | 5 | References didn't follow APA style The table didn't follow APA style The table also was created using tabs rather than the Word table functions |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Need to cite the authors of the background studies table was almost imposible to see due to the color choices |
Total (50pts) | 37 |
banks | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also useful for contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to remember to cite the names of the authors of the background studies. |
Total (50pts) | 48 |
lefty | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is nice for contacting other researchers via e-mail. |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 4 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 9 | The cells for the totals did not appear to use excel functions |
6 (10pts) | 7 | The table was not APA style You got carried away with the number of decimal places with your standard deviation The reference section also didn't follow APA style |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 44 |
20675 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Need to give the names of the authors of the background research No graphs were included |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
95286 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 7 | Test type labels should be more informative should remove some of the redundant labels the references were not in APA format |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to give the authors of the background articles credit, mention their names |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
06139 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
96073 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Test type labels needed to be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 9 | need to cite the authors of the studies in your background review |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
clear | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail also needed more examples |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 7 | Your averages and standard deviations for test types 2 & 3 were incorrect |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Table was not APA styles Test type labels needed to be more informative |
7 (10pts) | 8 | slide 5 didn't fit on the page need to give the authors names of the background research |
Total (50pts) | 41 |
00754 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 3 | Examples? |
2 (5pts) | 3 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail More examples |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Test type labels should be more informative Don't use full first names in the references |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Background review too sketchy |
Total (50pts) | 47 |
82757 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 3 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 7 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 43 |
smile | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 8 | Where are the anxiety marginals? |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Need the anxiety breakdowns by test type |
7 (10pts) | 7 | Where is the table? Need to cite the authors of the background articles |
Total (50pts) | 42 | if you saw a 39 before, it was because I added wrong. Sorry. |
dizzy | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Why the dotted lines? Not APA approved |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Where is the table? |
Total (50pts) | 45 | -1 for late |
72829 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Email too. |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 7 | Table not APA style References not APA style no headers or footers in Word part |
7 (10pts) | 8 | need to cite the authors in the background review No animations in the presentation |
Total (50pts) | 44 |
29829 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 7 | Reference section is missing Table was organized in a strange way |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to cite the names of the researchers of the the background studies |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
jerry | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 6 | No name in header Margins are messed up don't use full first names in references a bit too much redundancy in the table labels |
7 (10pts) | 10 | |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
82987 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 3 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail Need more examples |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Don't use full first names in your reference section |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Don't forget to cite the names of the authors who did the background research |
Total (50pts) | 46 |
07971 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 4 | Need more examples, too brief |
2 (5pts) | 3 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail Also could use more examples |
3 (5pts) | 3 | What about the preparation part of the question? |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 9 | Forgot your title |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Table not APA style Don't use the full first names of authors in your reference section |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to cite the authors in your background review |
Total (50pts) | 41 |
35054 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Table isn't APA style |
7 (10pts) | 2 | This looked incomplete |
Total (50pts) | 40 |
81778 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Need to cite the authors of the background studies |
Total (50pts) | 48 |
04591 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is also a great way of contacting other researchers via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 9 | No title |
6 (10pts) | 9 | Why the dashed lines? Not APA approved |
7 (10pts) | 7 | Where is the table? Need to cite the authors in the background review |
Total (50pts) | 44 |
27829 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 9 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 49 |
82791 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 3 | E-mail is also available over the web, making it easy to contact other researchers More examples were needed |
3 (5pts) | 3 | More discussion of the hourglass shape was needed |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Table had some style problems No reference section |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Where is the table? |
Total (50pts) | 42 |
12345 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 4 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 6 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
67223 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Web allows e-mail between researchers |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 9 | No graphs |
Total (50pts) | 48 |
71430 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Nice Job |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 7 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Nice Job |
Total (50pts) | 42 |
072200 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 4 | Need some examples |
2 (5pts) | 4 | The web is nice for e-mailing other researchers |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 7 | The marginal cells weren't dynamic (that is, they didn't seem to use the excel functions) |
6 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
7 (10pts) | 8 | The table was small and hard to read Need to report the names of the authors who did the background research |
Total (50pts) | 43 |
84292 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Web is good for e-mailing other researchers |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 6 | No name in header margins are messed up table contains label redundancy APA style doesn't use full first names in the references |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Some of the material didn't fit onto the slides the table was hard to read (too small) |
Total (50pts) | 43 |
194186 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Web is good for contacting other researcher via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 10 | Nice Job |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Wanted you to use the header and footer functions, not just typing them in table not APA format and some redundancy in the labels |
7 (10pts) | 8 | Need to include authors names of the background research the table is hard to read because it looks "squished" |
Total (50pts) | 45 |
6654 | ||
Question # | Points | Comments |
1 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
2 (5pts) | 4 | Web is good for contacting other researcher via e-mail |
3 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
4 (5pts) | 5 | Nice Job |
5 (10pts) | 9 | Parts were hard to interpret |
6 (10pts) | 8 | Wanted you to use the header and footer functions, not just typing them in APA style doesn't require full first names in the references |
7 (10pts) | 5 | Need to include authors names of the background research the table wasn't included the background review was a bit light No use of animation |
Total (50pts) | 45 |